Canon Rf-s 18-150mm Vs Rf 24-105mm: The Ultimate Comparison Guide
What To Know
- The RF-S 18-150mm lens has a wider focal length range, covering 18mm to 150mm, while the RF 24-105mm lens has a narrower focal length range, covering 24mm to 105mm.
- The wider focal length range of the RF-S 18-150mm lens makes it a more versatile option for photographers who want a single lens that can handle a wide variety of shooting situations.
- If you’re willing to spend more money for a lens with a larger maximum aperture and better image quality, the RF 24-105mm lens is the better choice.
When it comes to choosing a versatile all-around lens for your Canon EOS R-series camera, two excellent options are the RF-S 18-150mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM and the RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM. Both lenses offer a wide focal length range, making them suitable for various shooting situations, from landscapes to portraits to wildlife. However, there are some key differences between the two lenses that may make one a better choice for you than the other. In this blog post, we’ll compare the Canon RF-S 18-150mm vs RF 24-105mm lenses in terms of their focal length range, aperture, image quality, autofocus performance, and price.
Focal Length Range: Canon RF-S 18-150mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM vs RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM
One of the key differences between the RF-S 18-150mm and RF 24-105mm lenses is their focal length range. The RF-S 18-150mm lens has a wider focal length range, covering 18mm to 150mm, while the RF 24-105mm lens has a narrower focal length range, covering 24mm to 105mm.
The wider focal length range of the RF-S 18-150mm lens makes it a more versatile option for photographers who want a single lens that can handle a wide variety of shooting situations. It’s ideal for landscapes, portraits, street photography, and even wildlife photography. The RF 24-105mm lens, on the other hand, is better suited for portraiture, travel photography, and everyday shooting.
Aperture: Canon RF-S 18-150mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM vs RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM
Another key difference between the RF-S 18-150mm and RF 24-105mm lenses is their aperture. The RF-S 18-150mm lens has a maximum aperture of f/3.5 at the wide end and f/6.3 at the telephoto end, while the RF 24-105mm lens has a maximum aperture of f/4 at the wide end and f/7.1 at the telephoto end.
The wider maximum aperture of the RF-S 18-150mm lens makes it better suited for low-light photography and shooting in shallow depth of field. It also allows you to use faster shutter speeds to freeze motion. The RF 24-105mm lens, on the other hand, is better suited for shooting in bright conditions and for capturing sharp images of moving subjects.
Image Quality: Canon RF-S 18-150mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM vs RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM
In terms of image quality, both the RF-S 18-150mm and RF 24-105mm lenses produce excellent results. However, the RF 24-105mm lens has a slight edge in terms of sharpness and detail. This is likely due to its larger maximum aperture, which allows it to gather more light.
Autofocus Performance: Canon RF-S 18-150mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM vs RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM
Both the RF-S 18-150mm and RF 24-105mm lenses feature STM (Stepper Motor) autofocus systems, which are known for their speed and accuracy. In practice, both lenses focus quickly and accurately, even in low-light conditions.
Price: Canon RF-S 18-150mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM vs RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM
The RF-S 18-150mm lens is significantly cheaper than the RF 24-105mm lens. This makes it a more affordable option for photographers who are on a budget.
Which Lens is Right for You?
The Canon RF-S 18-150mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM and RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM lenses are both excellent choices for photographers who are looking for a versatile all-around lens. The RF-S 18-150mm lens is a great option for photographers who want a wide focal length range and a budget-friendly price. The RF 24-105mm lens is a better choice for photographers who need a lens with a larger maximum aperture and better image quality.
The Final Verdict
Ultimately, the best lens for you depends on your individual needs and budget. If you’re looking for a versatile all-around lens that’s affordable and easy to use, the RF-S 18-150mm lens is a great choice. If you’re willing to spend more money for a lens with a larger maximum aperture and better image quality, the RF 24-105mm lens is the better choice.
Frequently Discussed Topics
1. Which lens is better for low-light photography?
The RF-S 18-150mm lens has a wider maximum aperture of f/3.5, making it better suited for low-light photography than the RF 24-105mm lens, which has a maximum aperture of f/4.
2. Which lens is better for shooting in shallow depth of field?
The RF-S 18-150mm lens has a wider maximum aperture of f/3.5, making it better suited for shooting in shallow depth of field than the RF 24-105mm lens, which has a maximum aperture of f/4.
3. Which lens is better for shooting portraits?
Both lenses are good for shooting portraits, but the RF 24-105mm lens has a slightly wider maximum aperture of f/4, making it better suited for shooting portraits in low-light conditions or for creating a shallow depth of field.
4. Which lens is better for shooting landscapes?
The RF-S 18-150mm lens has a wider focal length range, making it better suited for shooting landscapes than the RF 24-105mm lens.
5. Which lens is better for shooting wildlife?
The RF-S 18-150mm lens has a longer focal length range, making it better suited for shooting wildlife than the RF 24-105mm lens.
