Canon Ef-s 18-200mm Vs Sigma 18-200mm: The Ultimate Comparison Of All-in-one Lenses
What To Know
- The Canon lens is generally sharper in the center of the frame, while the Sigma lens is sharper towards the edges.
- The Canon EF-S 18-200mm lens has a number of features that the Sigma 18-200mm lens does not, including.
When it comes to choosing a versatile all-in-one lens for your Canon APS-C DSLR camera, two popular options are the Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS and the Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM. Both lenses offer a wide range of focal lengths, making them ideal for everything from wide-angle landscapes to telephoto portraits. But which one is the better choice? In this blog post, we’ll compare the Canon EF-S 18-200mm vs Sigma 18-200mm lenses in terms of image quality, features, and price to help you make an informed decision.
Image Quality
The Canon EF-S 18-200mm and Sigma 18-200mm lenses both produce excellent image quality, but there are some subtle differences between them. The Canon lens is generally sharper in the center of the frame, while the Sigma lens is sharper towards the edges. The Canon lens also has less chromatic aberration, which can cause purple or green fringing around high-contrast edges.
Features
The Canon EF-S 18-200mm lens has a number of features that the Sigma 18-200mm lens does not, including:
- Image Stabilization (IS): This feature helps to reduce camera shake, making it easier to shoot sharp photos in low-light conditions or at slow shutter speeds.
- Ultrasonic Motor (USM): This motor provides fast and silent autofocus, making it ideal for shooting moving subjects.
- Full-time Manual Focus: This feature allows you to manually focus the lens even when autofocus is engaged.
Price
The Canon EF-S 18-200mm lens is typically more expensive than the Sigma 18-200mm lens. However, the Canon lens often goes on sale, so it’s worth shopping around for the best price.
Which Lens is Right for You?
The Canon EF-S 18-200mm and Sigma 18-200mm lenses are both excellent choices for all-in-one lenses. The Canon lens has a slight edge in terms of image quality and features, but it is also more expensive. The Sigma lens is a more affordable option, and it still produces excellent image quality. Ultimately, the best lens for you will depend on your budget and your individual needs.
Canon EF-S 18-200mm vs Sigma 18-200mm: A Summary
Feature | Canon EF-S 18-200mm | Sigma 18-200mm |
— | — | — |
Focal Length | 18-200mm | 18-200mm |
Maximum Aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.5-6.3 |
Minimum Aperture | f/22 | f/22 |
Image Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
Ultrasonic Motor | Yes | No |
Full-time Manual Focus | Yes | No |
Price | $699 | $499 |
Sample Images
Here are some sample images taken with the Canon EF-S 18-200mm and Sigma 18-200mm lenses:
[Image of a landscape taken with the Canon EF-S 18-200mm lens]
[Image of a portrait taken with the Sigma 18-200mm lens]
Final Note: Canon EF-S 18-200mm vs Sigma 18-200mm
The Canon EF-S 18-200mm and Sigma 18-200mm lenses are both excellent choices for all-in-one lenses. The Canon lens has a slight edge in terms of image quality and features, but it is also more expensive. The Sigma lens is a more affordable option, and it still produces excellent image quality. Ultimately, the best lens for you will depend on your budget and your individual needs.
Basics You Wanted To Know
Q: Which lens is sharper, the Canon EF-S 18-200mm or the Sigma 18-200mm?
A: The Canon lens is generally sharper in the center of the frame, while the Sigma lens is sharper towards the edges.
Q: Which lens has better image stabilization, the Canon EF-S 18-200mm or the Sigma 18-200mm?
A: The Canon lens has better image stabilization.
Q: Which lens is faster to focus, the Canon EF-S 18-200mm or the Sigma 18-200mm?
A: The Canon lens is faster to focus.
Q: Which lens is better for video, the Canon EF-S 18-200mm or the Sigma 18-200mm?
A: The Canon lens is better for video because it has full-time manual focus.
Q: Which lens is better for low-light photography, the Canon EF-S 18-200mm or the Sigma 18-200mm?
A: The Canon lens is better for low-light photography because it has a wider maximum aperture.