Canon Ef-s 10-22mm Vs Tamron 10-24mm: Which Ultra Wide-angle Lens Reigns Supreme?
What To Know
- 5 Di II VC HLD is a slightly larger and heavier lens than the Canon EF-S 10-22mm, but it offers a few additional features that may be worth the extra weight and cost.
- The Tamron lens is a better choice for those who need a lens that offers a wider maximum aperture, weather-sealing, and a lens hood.
- It offers a wider maximum aperture, weather-sealing, a lens hood, and a more advanced image stabilization system than the Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.
When it comes to ultra-wide-angle lenses for Canon EF-S mount cameras, two of the most popular options are the Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM and the Tamron 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 Di II VC HLD. Both lenses offer similar focal lengths, apertures, and image quality, but there are a few key differences that may make one lens a better choice for you than the other.
Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
The Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM is a compact and lightweight lens that is ideal for travel and landscape photography. It features a fast and accurate autofocus system, making it a good choice for shooting moving subjects. The lens also has a built-in image stabilizer, which helps to reduce camera shake and produce sharper images.
Pros:
- Compact and lightweight
- Fast and accurate autofocus
- Built-in image stabilizer
- Good image quality
Cons:
- Narrow maximum aperture
- Not weather-sealed
- No lens hood included
Tamron 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 Di II VC HLD
The Tamron 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 Di II VC HLD is a slightly larger and heavier lens than the Canon EF-S 10-22mm, but it offers a few additional features that may be worth the extra weight and cost. These features include a wider maximum aperture, weather-sealing, and a lens hood. The Tamron lens also has a more advanced image stabilization system than the Canon lens, which can help to produce even sharper images in low-light conditions.
Pros:
- Wider maximum aperture
- Weather-sealed
- Lens hood included
- More advanced image stabilization system
- Good image quality
Cons:
- Larger and heavier than the Canon lens
- More expensive than the Canon lens
Which Lens Is Right for You?
The best lens for you will depend on your specific needs and budget. If you are looking for a compact and lightweight lens that is ideal for travel and landscape photography, the Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM is a good option. However, if you need a lens that offers a wider maximum aperture, weather-sealing, and a lens hood, the Tamron 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 Di II VC HLD is a better choice.
Image Quality
Both the Canon EF-S 10-22mm and the Tamron 10-24mm lenses produce excellent image quality. However, the Tamron lens has a slight edge in terms of sharpness and detail, especially at the wide end of the focal range.
Autofocus
Both lenses feature fast and accurate autofocus systems. However, the Canon lens has a slight edge in terms of speed, especially in low-light conditions.
Image Stabilization
The Tamron 10-24mm lens has a more advanced image stabilization system than the Canon lens. This can help to produce sharper images in low-light conditions or when shooting handheld.
Build Quality
The Canon EF-S 10-22mm lens is made of plastic, while the Tamron 10-24mm lens is made of metal. This makes the Tamron lens more durable and weather-resistant.
Price
The Canon EF-S 10-22mm lens is typically less expensive than the Tamron 10-24mm lens. However, the Tamron lens offers a few additional features that may be worth the extra cost.
Final Verdict
Both the Canon EF-S 10-22mm and the Tamron 10-24mm lenses are excellent ultra-wide-angle lenses for Canon EF-S mount cameras. The Canon lens is a good choice for those who are looking for a compact and lightweight lens that is ideal for travel and landscape photography. The Tamron lens is a better choice for those who need a lens that offers a wider maximum aperture, weather-sealing, and a lens hood.
The Winner: Tamron 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 Di II VC HLD
The Tamron 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 Di II VC HLD is the better lens overall. It offers a wider maximum aperture, weather-sealing, a lens hood, and a more advanced image stabilization system than the Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM. The Tamron lens also produces slightly sharper and more detailed images, especially at the wide end of the focal range.
What People Want to Know
1. Which lens is better for low-light photography, the Canon EF-S 10-22mm or the Tamron 10-24mm?
The Tamron 10-24mm is better for low-light photography because it has a wider maximum aperture of f/3.5 compared to the Canon EF-S 10-22mm’s f/4.5. This means that the Tamron lens can let in more light, which can help to produce sharper images in low-light conditions.
2. Which lens is better for video recording, the Canon EF-S 10-22mm or the Tamron 10-24mm?
The Canon EF-S 10-22mm is better for video recording because it has a faster autofocus system than the Tamron 10-24mm. This means that the Canon lens can lock on to subjects more quickly and accurately, which is important for smooth and stable video footage.
3. Which lens is better for astrophotography, the Canon EF-S 10-22mm or the Tamron 10-24mm?
The Tamron 10-24mm is better for astrophotography because it has a wider maximum aperture of f/3.5 compared to the Canon EF-S 10-22mm’s f/4.5. This means that the Tamron lens can let in more light, which can help to produce brighter and more detailed images of the night sky.
